Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: BREAKING NEWS: FATBOY LOSES IT


Control Freak

Status: Offline
Posts: 1163
Date:
RE: BREAKING NEWS: FATBOY LOSES IT
Permalink   


It seems Fatboy is toning it down a bit today.

#3 Today, 08:06 AM
Dennis Olson
Chief Curmudgeon 754
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 35,301

Joe was removed for a number of reasons. He'd been to TO, warned, been to TO, warned, etc, etc. We'd allowed him to get away with far more than we should have BECAUSE we felt he was a good guy. However, he was engaged in activities of late that simply couldn't be ignored. Unfortunately, he'd used up his "get out of jail free" cards a LONG time ago, and he was well aware of that fact. I sent him a personal email (that was before I learned that he'd threatened my life) expressing my personal regret that he'd been banned.

__________________
When a chick says we need to talk, you might as well start punching yourself in the balls, dude.


Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 66
Date:
Permalink   

"he was engaged in activities of late that simply couldn't be ignored".

What might those be?  Geeze, they sound like the KGB all up in your grill.furious

__________________


Control Freak

Status: Offline
Posts: 1163
Date:
Permalink   

BBSAM wrote:

"he was engaged in activities of late that simply couldn't be ignored".

What might those be?  Geeze, they sound like the KGB all up in your grill.furious




He dared question fatboy.banned.gif So now the character assassination must begin to make him look like the bad guy and fatboy to look like the victim. buggered.gif



-- Edited by Eric Cartman at 10:45, 2007-05-05

__________________
When a chick says we need to talk, you might as well start punching yourself in the balls, dude.
X


Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 84
Date:
Permalink   

Take It Outside (16 Viewing)


hmmmm

__________________
X


Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 84
Date:
Permalink   

"he was engaged in activities of late that simply couldn't be ignored".

What might those be?


idea.gif

Using his brain?


__________________


Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 11
Date:
Permalink   

Has POJ been here yet? 

I can vouch for both him and Brooks (as if we don't already know that), having met both of them IRL.  This is just another typical Olson Justification for poor behavior.

Dan V. 

__________________
The grass is always greener over the septic tank.


Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 90
Date:
Permalink   

Cartman wrote:

Today, 09:20 PM 
 Dennis Olson
Chief Curmudgeon 754
   Join Date: May 2001
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 35,293 
 
First, the staffer was NOT Satanta. Second, the staff member is willing to testify in court that this threat was made.




Chopper wrote:

Chopper wrote:

 #34 
Old Today, 09:59 PM
Dennis Olson's Avatar    
Dennis Olson Dennis Olson is offline
Chief Curmudgeon 754
         
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 35,294
The people who have spoken to me had direct conversations with him (and they've had them before, so they know who he is), where the threats were made... And the people to whom he spoke WILL testify in court.





TodayDennis Olson's Avatar
Dennis Olson Dennis Olson is online now
Chief Curmudgeon

Join Date: May 2001
Location: Wisconsin

I will say this one time:

I have independently verified information that XXX, who lives in XXX with XXX, has threatened my life. I chose to make the threat public in the hope that shining the light of day on such a THREAT TO MURDER SOMEONE BY A MEMBER would cause the person to rethink their pending actions. Once a THREAT TO MURDER SOMEONE is made here, all guarantees of "meatworld privacy" are null and void.

If some of you cannot understand WHY that would be true, I do invite you to make your cyber home elsewhere. I will not discuss this further, nor debate with those of you armchair quarterbacks to have NOTHING BUT WORDS invested in this. My life was directly threatened. Not yours or your loved ones. Now I respectfully submit that you consider the hard reality of what I just said.

Brooks was entirely collateral damage. When Lynnie was banned, she immediately logged on as Markus in an attempt to continue her "crusade." Because of that, Markus' account had to be removed as well. When PoJ was banned, I felt that he'd simply log on as Brooks and continue doing the things that caused his removal. (And no, it was NOT his responses on a thread that brought it on.)

Staff decisions are not up for a popularity vote. The fact that we even ALLOW discussion of these topics should be proof enough of how genuinely lenient this place is compared to many others. I WILL take whatever action I deem necessary to safeguard not only the forum and its members, but myself as well. Note that recently, there have been forays from ex-members into MY REAL LIFE. Because of that, I take a murder threat pretty seriously.

You are free not to of course, because it's not your lives that are being threatened.

Now, if you can't remain on TB after reading this post, please just LEAVE. The Internet is a very big place. My goal is to remain safe, and keep my family safe, in our real world lives. Whether or not that affects some of your "personal trust" in me doesn't matter...

EDIT: For the record, I just finished providing the responding officer with the complete details and contact information not only for the people to whom XXX made the threats, but for XXX as well. So the whole thing is now completely on-the-record with the police.



__________________
X


Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 84
Date:
Permalink   

DJ, if you're in contact with the accused, please let him know that people aren't buying this outrageous, outright lie from Lardass. XXX has the support of many, many people.

I thought when he accused Vipper that was as low as he could get, but he topped himself with this one.

Do the mods and other admins not understand that as TB is now incorporated, they are in fact agents of the company and can also be held liable for making/maintaining false accusations? It doesn't matter if they're compensated or not, they're acting and serving as agents of the company.

I don't believe for a minute they all believe this latest crap, so why do they stay? If it's out of some ill-conceived misplaced loyalty to DO, the kindest thing they could do is figure out how to get him involuntarily committed and then do it.


__________________
ALF


Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 11
Date:
Permalink   

L*a lost it a long time ago. His symptoms just keep reappearing from time to time.

ALF

__________________


Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 92
Date:
Permalink   

I think in view of this latest LardAssian spasm, it's time to notify the Wisconsin authorities that there is a criminal [he has a criminal record so he's a criminal] in their jurisdiction running an ongoing criminal enterprise and an Internet cult.

Where's the list of all his criminal conduct ranging from the illegal raffle, vote fraud, stolen money from fundraisers, threats to the lives of the Exxon CEO and the Federal Attorney, etc etc ad nauseum?

__________________



Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 40
Date:
Permalink   

I'm sure I'm far from the only person who's been communicating to 'the accused' that nobody & I mean NOBODY who's had anything to do with him online buys any of this garbage for a second. I hope he believes that because even the few people I know who've had some issues with him in the past flat out refuse to buy into this ****.

__________________


Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 15
Date:
Permalink   

X wrote:

I don't believe for a minute they all believe this latest crap, so why do they stay? If it's out of some ill-conceived misplaced loyalty to DO, the kindest thing they could do is figure out how to get him involuntarily committed and then do it.




they must be making an unfreakinbeliveable amount of money. 7+ yrs x $$$,$$$.$$ ?

__________________


Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 47
Date:
Permalink   

The latest . . . right before the thread got closed . . .

 Yesterday, 11:37 PM
   
Dennis Olson 
Chief Curmudgeon

    
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 35,320
onebyone said:

Quote:
Since you Dennis have seriously breeched the rules on member's private information and again willfully today, if the rules are going to be followed then Dennis the honorable thing is I am afraid you must step down and appoint or have the board or mods elect a new chief head. You must remove yourself from staff and regretfully have your membership in Timebomb2000 revoked.

No. You are free to go anywhere you wish however, and Godspeed to you.

I learned about the threat to my person about 15 minutes before I posted it to the forum. My thought for posting was simple:

If, by "outing" him, I made him decide to not show up at my door, then that was a win. Why? Because if he DID show up at my door with intent to harm me, I'd have killed him. Now, even if that killing were 100% "righteous" WRT criminal action, I'd still spend the next year in court and $100,000 of my own money in defense of a wrongful death suit. In that event, we'd lose our home and almost everything we own and be destitute.

So, take that chance, or post a public thread to let him know that lots of people now knew what he'd threatened in order to make him reconsider. Seems like the post was the much wiser choice.

And on that note, not ONE of you folks were placed in this position. I was the only person facing this problem. How many of you would be willing to send me thousands of $'s for my defense? How many of you would be in a position to give me a new job when the (potential) wrongful death suit came to trial and my employer cut me loose?

And why did I take THIS particular threat seriously? Because less than two weeks ago, multiple people decided to take a cyber-attack into my real life in a concerted effort to destroy me. So let's just say that I am now more sensitive to nut-cases than I was before all this.

And oBo, who should run TB? YOU??? To be frank, your board persona over the past couple of years has, IMO, demonstrated that you are borderline nuts as well.

JMHO - YMMV

This thread has gone way too far. All questions as to why I posted the information have now been answered.

Thread closed. Should any of you wish to continue this discussion, take to some other venue. It will no longer be discussed here. AT ALL.
  #98     
 Yesterday, 11:39 PM
Renegade 
Veteran Member

    
Join Date: May 2002
Location: in the woods....
Posts: 1,337
Just wow.

I leave town yesterday thinking that maybe this latest dustup *might*possibly* be on it's way to winding down. I get back this afternoon to find all of this!

Dennis,
I hate to be the one to tell you this but you really **** and fell back in it this time. Going public with Joe's info was just plain wrong, and for multiple reasons. And it wasn't very smart either. If you're told of a threat, you assess the credibility and if you think it's legit, you gather your evidence and give it to the cops. While doing that you make any preparations for you or your family that is pertinent. But, you don't grab your personal high speed electron megaphone and start blabbing it all out to the world. And you sure don't turn around and possibly liable yourself in retaliation.

Richw is about right. You've left your nethers hanging out for target practice.

I've been reading Joe for a quite a few years now and I just don't see it. And not knowing the credibility of your secret accuser, I'd say this has all the looks of two things. Either it's a pot stirring drama event, or you're being played like a fiddle.

Either way, if this was as serious as you are making it out to be, then no one (mods aside) on this board should even know about it.

You can play it smart or emotional, but not both.
  #99     
 Yesterday, 11:40 PM
   
Dennis Olson 
Chief Curmudgeon

    
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 35,320
Renegade, since you DO NOT KNOW who the "witnesses" are, you're position is completely without merit.
  #100     
 Yesterday, 11:51 PM
   
eXe 
Techno Junkie

    
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: The Kingdom Of Nye
Posts: 6,836

Quote:
Originally Posted by Onebyone 

You have had a good long ride being in charge Dennis but you have seriously broken the rules. Do the honorable thing.


I don't mean to pick on you OBO.. but I want everyone to see those words again.


THIS is the agenda here folks.. Kick Dennis out.

THIS is the reason we are going through this every few months.

Some people who deem themselves "More intelligent" then you want to remove Dennis as the one in charge of this board.

Why would they spend hours digging up dirt? Why the CONSTANT attacks? One reason.. They want Dennis gone.

They will lie, threaten, twist the truth, hunt for dirt until one thing happens.. We as a group ignore them.

It gets pretty boring to fight a one sided fight. They can do nothing if we as a group ignore them.

We have seen how they can pull good board members apart, put bits of suspicion into members and look what we have.

You want to "get even" with these people and this get rid of this mentality, do the one thing that will do it and ignore them.

So instead of typing that reply, instead of trolling for dirt on them, instead of arguing with anyone here, just let it go. Let Dennis handle what he needs to and just enjoy tb2k for what it is. People act like this is some kind of national security issue here.. its a MESSAGE BOARD people.. not the end of the world.

If you feel that tb2k has gone bad, by all means, move on (and no I am not trying to say that in a mean way). If you are happy here then stay. You don't own tb2k and tb2k does not own you.

This garbage is so not worth it, We come here to learn and share ideas as well as catch up on news.. we do NOT come here to catch up on the latest he said she said gossip.. its tb2k not Survivor or some other mindless reality show.
__________________
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Our enemy has the will to destroy us, but lacks the means.
We have the means to destroy our enemy, but lack the will.
It is a race to see who gets what first.
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-


__________________


Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 92
Date:
Permalink   

Okay, let me look that over for a minute....

OBO points out LardAss is in serious violation of the boards "rules" and should step down.

LardAss invites OBO to go fugg himself because breaking the rules was in LardAss's best interest.

eXe points out that LardAss was in serious violation of the board's rules because dammit those Uncle Bob freaks forced him to! And the only solution to the problem was to drink more KoolAid! Ignore the things you have seen with your own eyes, the repeated publishing of member's personal information, the incitement to murder, the missing funds, the theft of a board and its assets ["You don't own TB2K!]. Ignore the reality of your leader being a ball-sniffing wad gobbler! Just ignore the truth and accept this as a good thing! - - - Or just move along and let us keep fleecing the new sheep.


These people have gone completely fuggin' nuts. They are no longer just KoolAid drinking cultists, they represent a danger to themselves and society in general. Time to start making some phone calls and snail-mailing some packages of documentation.

__________________



Control Freak

Status: Offline
Posts: 1163
Date:
Permalink   

EDIT: For the record, I just finished providing the responding officer with the complete details and contact information not only for the people to whom XXX made the threats, but for XXX as well. So the whole thing is now completely on-the-record with the police.


I hope the folks in Boston are lawyered up. Why didn't anyone contact the law when Fatboy threatened the CEO of Exon?

__________________
When a chick says we need to talk, you might as well start punching yourself in the balls, dude.


Control Freak

Status: Offline
Posts: 1163
Date:
Permalink   

Where's the list of all his criminal conduct ranging from the illegal raffle, vote fraud, stolen money from fundraisers, threats to the lives of the Exxon CEO and the Federal Attorney, etc etc ad nauseum?


Anyone have a copy of Fatboys threat to the U.S. Attorney?

__________________
When a chick says we need to talk, you might as well start punching yourself in the balls, dude.


Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 92
Date:
Permalink   

Eric Cartman wrote:


Anyone have a copy of Fatboys threat to the U.S. Attorney?




It's in one of those Border Patrol / Dope Smuggler Trial threads.



-- Edited by Mexi Scum at 09:11, 2007-05-06

__________________



Control Freak

Status: Offline
Posts: 1163
Date:
Permalink   

To be frank, your board persona over the past couple of years has, IMO, demonstrated that you are borderline nuts as well.


At least she is only borderline. You on the other hand Fatboy are certifiably nuts.

__________________
When a chick says we need to talk, you might as well start punching yourself in the balls, dude.


Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 5
Date:
Permalink   


To be frank, your board persona over the past couple of years has, IMO, demonstrated that you are borderline nuts as well.


So, by DO saying "...you are borderline nuts as well", he sounds as if he is saying, "you are borderline nuts just like me".  That's what I thought when I first read it, and I'm trying hard to find some other way to interpret that.

Is DO self-reporting that HE knows that he is nuts?

__________________
*******************************************************
I want my good name back from the vile impostors!


Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 90
Date:
Permalink   

UBuck, I was puzzling over that too.  Looks like a Freudian slip...laughing.gif

Paste from UBobs...

CRIMESPUBLIC PEACE 947.0125
1 Updated 0506 Wis. Stats. Database
CHAPTER 947
CRIMES AGAINST PUBLIC PEACE, ORDER AND OTHER INTERESTS
947.01 Disorderly conduct.
947.011 Disrupting a funeral or memorial service.
947.012 Unlawful use of telephone.
947.0125 Unlawful use of computerized communication systems.
947.013 Harassment.
947.015 Bomb scares.
947.017 Threats to release chemical, biological, or radioactive substances.
947.02 Vagrancy.
947.04 Drinking in common carriers.
947.06 Unlawful assemblies and their suppression.
947.07 Causing violence or breach of the peace by damaging or destroying a U.S.
flag.
Cross Reference: See definitions in s. 939.22.

947.01 Disorderly conduct. Whoever, in a public or private
place, engages in violent, abusive, indecent, profane, boisterous,
unreasonably loud or otherwise disorderly conduct under circumstances
in which the conduct tends to cause or provoke a disturbance
is guilty of a Class B misdemeanor
.
History: 1977 c. 173; 1979 c. 131.

A true threat is a statement that a speaker would reasonably foresee that a listener
would reasonably interpret as a serious expression of a purpose to inflict harm, as distinguished
from hyperbole, jest, innocuous talk, expressions of political views, or
other similarly protected speech. It is not necessary that the speaker have the ability
to carry out the threat. State v. Perkins, 2001 WI 46, 243 Wis. 2d 141, 626 N.W.2d
762, 991924.

Purely written speech, even written speech that fails to cause an actual disturbance,
can constitute disorderly conduct, but the state has the burden to prove that the speech
is constitutionally unprotected abusive conduct. Abusive conduct is conduct that
is injurious, improper, hurtful, offensive, or reproachful. True threats clearly fall
within the scope of this definition. State v. Douglas D. 2001 WI 47, 243 Wis. 2d 204,
626 N.W.2d 725, 991767.

Application of the disorderly conduct statute to speech alone is permissible under
appropriate circumstances. When speech is not an essential part of any exposition
of ideas, when it is utterly devoid of social value, and when it can cause or provoke
a disturbance, the disorderly conduct statute can be applicable. State v. A.S. 2001 WI
48, 243 Wis. 2d 173, 626 N.W.2d 712, 992317.

Disorderly conduct does not necessarily require disruptions that implicate the public
directly. This section encompasses conduct that tends to cause a disturbance or disruption
that is personal or private in nature, as long as there exists the real possibility
that the disturbance or disruption will spill over and disrupt the peace, order, or safety
of the surrounding community as well. Sending repeated, unwelcome, and anonymous
mailings was otherwise disorderly conduct. State v. Schwebke, 2002 WI 55,
253 Wis. 2d 1, 644 N.W.2d 666, 993204.

Defiance of a police officers order to move is itself disorderly conduct if the order
is lawful. Bruan v. Baldwin, 346 F.3d 761 (2003).

947.012 Unlawful use of telephone.

(1) Whoever does any of the following is guilty of a Class B misdemeanor:

(a) With intent to frighten, intimidate, threaten, abuse or
harass, makes a telephone call and threatens to inflict injury or
physical harm to any person or the property of any person
.

(b) With intent to frighten, intimidate, threaten or abuse, telephones
another and uses any obscene, lewd or profane language
or suggests any lewd or lascivious act
.

(c) Makes a telephone call, whether or not conversation
ensues, without disclosing his or her identity and with intent to
abuse or threaten any person at the called number
.

(2) Whoever does any of the following is subject to a Class B
forfeiture:

(a) With intent to harass or offend, telephones another and uses
any obscene, lewd or profane language or suggests any lewd or
lascivious act.

(b) Makes or causes the telephone of another repeatedly to
ring, with intent to harass
any person at the called number.

(c) Makes repeated telephone calls, whether or not conversation
ensues, with intent solely to harass any person at the called
number.

(d) Makes a telephone call, whether or not conversation
ensues, without disclosing his or her identity and with intent to
harass any person at the called number.

(e) Knowingly permits any telephone under his or her control
to be used for any purpose prohibited by this section.
History: 1979 c. 131; 1991 a. 39.

947.0125 Unlawful use of computerized communication
systems.

(1) In this section, message means any transfer
of signs, signals, writing, images, sounds, data or intelligence
of any nature, or any transfer of a computer program, as defined
in s. 943.70 (1) (c).

(2) Whoever does any of the following is guilty of a Class B
misdemeanor:

(a) With intent to frighten, intimidate, threaten, abuse or harass
another person, sends a message
to the person on an electronic
mail or other computerized communication system and in that
message threatens to inflict injury or physical harm to any person
or the property of any person
.

(b) With intent to frighten, intimidate, threaten, abuse or harass
another person, sends a message on an electronic mail or other
computerized communication system with the reasonable expectation
that the person will receive the message and in that message
threatens to inflict injury or physical harm to any person or the
property of any person
.

(c) With intent to frighten, intimidate, threaten or abuse
another person, sends a message to the person on an electronic
mail or other computerized communication system and in that
message uses any obscene, lewd or profane language or suggests
any lewd or lascivious act
.

(d) With intent to frighten, intimidate, threaten or abuse
another person, sends a message on an electronic mail or other
computerized communication system with the reasonable expectation
that the person will receive the message and in that message
uses any obscene, lewd or profane language or suggests any lewd
or lascivious act.

(e) With intent to frighten, intimidate, threaten or abuse
another person, sends a message to the person on an electronic
mail or other computerized communication system while intentionally
preventing or attempting to prevent the disclosure of his
or her own identity
.

(f) While intentionally preventing or attempting to prevent the
disclosure of his or her identity and with intent to frighten, intimidate,
threaten or abuse another person, sends a message on an
electronic mail or other computerized communication system
with the reasonable expectation that the person will receive the
message.

(3) Whoever does any of the following is subject to a Class B
forfeiture:

(a) With intent to harass, annoy or offend another person, sends
a message to the person on an electronic mail or other computerized
communication system and in that message uses any
obscene, lewd or profane language or suggests any lewd or lascivious
act
.

(b) With intent to harass, annoy or offend another person,
sends a message on an electronic mail or other computerized communication
system with the reasonable expectation that the person
will receive the message
and in that message uses any
obscene, lewd or profane language or suggests any lewd or lascivious
act
.

(c) With intent solely to harass another person, sends repeated
messages to the person on an electronic mail or other computerized

__________________


Control Freak

Status: Offline
Posts: 1163
Date:
Permalink   

A true threat is a statement that a speaker would reasonably foresee that a listener
would reasonably interpret as a serious expression of a purpose to inflict harm,
as distinguished
from hyperbole, jest, innocuous talk, expressions of political views, or
other similarly protected speech. It is not necessary that the speaker have the ability
to carry out the threat. State v. Perkins, 2001 WI 46, 243 Wis. 2d 141, 626 N.W.2d
762, 991924.


Does this mean Fatboy would have to hear the alleged threat himself?

__________________
When a chick says we need to talk, you might as well start punching yourself in the balls, dude.


Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 90
Date:
Permalink   

I dunno.  But in the TB version, the 'person,' which later became 'people' (real or imagined), who allegedly heard this threat didn't think it was serious themselves, or they would have told DO right away.  Hell, they would have shot off the never-before-used TB EAS ala an Amber Alert, having posters line I-90 donning astronaut diapers, looking for XXX's vehicle.  There would have been group buy discounts on night vision goggles, and a fund raiser to have NWPhotog stake out DO's place with a cam to prepare for his legal defense.

-- Edited by data junkie at 23:58, 2007-05-06

__________________


Control Freak

Status: Offline
Posts: 1163
Date:
Permalink   

laughing.gif Good one.

__________________
When a chick says we need to talk, you might as well start punching yourself in the balls, dude.


Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 11
Date:
Permalink   

You forgot about the foray to the Malwart for hamburger helper!

__________________
When does the beer truck show up?

If I'm not here, I'm logged out.
X


Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 84
Date:
Permalink   

This caught my eye as I was reading this thread again

I'd still spend the next year in court and $100,000 of my own money


This must be the goal for the next fundraiser.

__________________


Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 54
Date:
Permalink   





RE: $100,000




I certainly hope he hasn't skimmed and saved that much already! weirdface

__________________


Control Freak

Status: Offline
Posts: 1163
Date:
Permalink   

Dennis Olson
Chief Curmudgeon
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 35,373

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cribbage
Dennis, my advice would be to let it drop.

You are ONLY hurting your own credibility by stoking the fires. Kinda like the school yard bullies; ignore them, and eventually they will go away.

But you are protesting your innocence awfully loudly, and to an outsider, it just might seem a little "too" loudly.

Shakespeare was wise when he wrote "Me thinks he doth protest too loudly" or something like that.

Let it drop.

The more you stir the pot (and you ARE stirring it), the more guilty you look.

Let it drop.

Um, actually, this post is meant to alert the membership that supposed cyber-friends might contact them for whatever dirt they can get. While I can't control that (nor do I particularly care), I want folks to know that this is being attempted. What each person chooses to do (or not do) is their own choice. But IMO it's important to let people know when bad people are doing bad things.

The selective realities inhabited by some folks make me shake my head in disbelief.

JMHO - YMMV

__________________
When a chick says we need to talk, you might as well start punching yourself in the balls, dude.
Kat


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 258
Date:
Permalink   

Mexi Scum wrote:
__________________________________________________________________________

I think in view of this latest LardAssian spasm, it's time to notify the Wisconsin authorities that there is a criminal [he has a criminal record so he's a criminal] in their jurisdiction running an ongoing criminal enterprise and an Internet cult.

Where's the list of all his criminal conduct ranging from the illegal raffle, vote fraud, stolen money from fundraisers, threats to the lives of the Exxon CEO and the Federal Attorney, etc etc ad nauseum?
__________________________________________________________________________

Mexi, I contacted the authorities on April 22nd with further conversation and documentation on the 23rd. They are VERY aware of DJO.

__________________


Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 54
Date:
Permalink   





Just in case it's needed... What are the Wisconsin/Minnesota
statutes on sodomy?



Also have either of those states (or perhaps the Twin Cities) passed any ordinances on Trans Fatty foods yet? biggrin


And just for good meausre, I'd REALLY like to see the PD & FD
show up @ 1313 Mockingbird Lane in Hudson to haul away all of Lardass' dangerous and (getting old) gasoline.

If The Committee cares to stir some **** biggrin in that direction it should be easy to get a list of his closest neighbors in the Internet (MSN White Pages) to "stoke up" their concern. This is perfectly legal and it's my understanding, Jerome's neighbors are not thrilled with his activities in the first place. Just a thought.

P.S. This would not fall into the category of stalking or harassing
        family members. It would be doing a community service. If
        we act quickly, no way would Thunder Buns have time to do
        anything but watch the festivities and pay the (steep) fine (s).
        After a cursory inspection the REAL LEOs  they may (will) even
        find other code violations relating to fire hazards, neighborhood
        peace and safety, perhaps even firearms excesses.  
  


-- Edited by OBLIVIOUS at 21:27, 2007-05-10

-- Edited by OBLIVIOUS at 21:28, 2007-05-10

__________________
Kat


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 258
Date:
Permalink   

Sounds like a plan...........



__________________


Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 20
Date:
Permalink   

OBLIVIOUS wrote:





 @ 1313 Mockingbird Lane



LOL, thats the address on my Safeway club card.

"having posters line I-90 donning astronaut diapers,"

And that was the funniest thing I've seen in a while, thanks.
rofl.gif

 



__________________


Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 54
Date:
Permalink   




Growler: I used 1313 Mockingbird Lane as my address when I bought my first computer in the year 2000 (you know, after Y2K happened, NOT!)  in Amarillo.   aww

__________________


Control Freak

Status: Offline
Posts: 1163
Date:
Permalink   

Fatboy has been laying low since this last blowup. If I were the damaged parties in this I would have an attorney and end up owning Fatboy and his bike.

__________________
When a chick says we need to talk, you might as well start punching yourself in the balls, dude.


Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 90
Date:
Permalink   


Cartman wrote:

Today, 09:20 PM 
 Dennis Olson
Chief Curmudgeon 754
   Join Date: May 2001
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 35,293 
 
First, the staffer was NOT Satanta. Second, the staff member is willing to testify in court that this threat was made.




Who are the staff members?

DO
Satanta
Timbo
eXe
HA
RodeoRector
Flying Dutchman

Who else?



__________________
Kat


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 258
Date:
Permalink   

Yellow Springs
Warren Bone
jmh
Green Co
Oddone
Kris Dandelion
Christian for Israel
Intergator
Fleataxi



Edited for correction

-- Edited by Kat at 05:55, 2007-05-13

__________________


Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 47
Date:
Permalink   

I haven't seen yellowspring around lately.

__________________


Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 6
Date:
Permalink   

Yellowsprings quit her TB modship and is settling down at CE.

__________________
Kat


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 258
Date:
Permalink   

Thanks, Brooks, and welcome....

__________________


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 246
Date:
Permalink   

Hiya, Brooks!!!  Got those tomatoes growing?

biggrin

__________________
I didn't kiss Jor_el's ass.  Therefore, my name is Mudd.


Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 6
Date:
Permalink   

Thanks, Kat.

Hi Mudd! Tomatoes are outside on the deck hardening off.

__________________


Control Freak

Status: Offline
Posts: 1163
Date:
Permalink   

Someone has to ask so it might as well be me. Are you and POJ going to let Fatboy get away with it?

__________________
When a chick says we need to talk, you might as well start punching yourself in the balls, dude.


Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 90
Date:
Permalink   

There are fifteen friggin' mods?  weirdface

Thanks Kat.

So that's the list including the user name of the person DO first mentioned as the informant, or whatever.  Office pool on who it is?  Brooks, you're not allowed to play.

popcorn.gif

-- Edited by data junkie at 18:51, 2007-05-12

__________________


Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 54
Date:
Permalink   





I know the LEAST about jmh & Todberg. confused


__________________


Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 90
Date:
Permalink   

I'd pick Timbo based on board history.  Once upon a time this dude posted an uneventful remark, and Timbo twisted it in his little noggin' into meaning that said dude was suicidal, and went off on this retired cop rampage about the imagined crisis.  He posted a new thread on the dude, broadcasting that ole boy was suicidal and we needed to get ahold of him or some such nonsense. 

I PM'd Timbo to say that the initial post in question wasn't suicidal at all, and that Timbo was out of line starting a thread calling ole boy out because ole boy might read the board at work and his boss could see it or something.  Timbo got all paranoid hostile on me, and was livid esp. because I had corrected his modship, when lol I didn't even know he'd been made a mod, and besides that was irrelevant.  Happy ending: ole boy just laughed it off and thanked him for the concern. 

I don't know much about the other mods; I just know this past pattern of behavior on the part of Timbo, and how that pattern could overlay the current drama.

__________________
X


Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 84
Date:
Permalink   

I know the LEAST about jmh & Todberg.todberg is not a mod, but he's hung around since Greenspun. He is and always has been an asskisser.

jmh is the daughter of "aintitfunny". I very much doubt it was her.

Timbo or Intergator, I have no doubt they'd do it without hesitation.

__________________


Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 54
Date:
Permalink   




IIRC, TIMBO HAS BEEN THE ONE MENTIONED MOST SINCE THE MOLE TALK STARTED...


/Just sayin'  evileye


__________________


Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 74
Date:
Permalink   

fatboy cant lose it, ya know he had the operation, didnt work, couldnt keep his damn mouth shut. except for me of course. he he!

__________________
uncle bucks little bitch


Control Freak

Status: Offline
Posts: 1163
Date:
Permalink   

Hey Chubb I should have said this sooner, welcome to the board. donut.gif

__________________
When a chick says we need to talk, you might as well start punching yourself in the balls, dude.


Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 74
Date:
Permalink   

cartman, you posted a pic of a luv ring. me n uncle buck used that plenty times.

__________________
uncle bucks little bitch


Control Freak

Status: Offline
Posts: 1163
Date:
Permalink   

chubbalishus wrote:

cartman, you posted a pic of a luv ring. me n uncle buck used that plenty times.




You guys get freaky with donuts? eyepopping.gif



__________________
When a chick says we need to talk, you might as well start punching yourself in the balls, dude.
«First  <  1 2 3  >  Last»  | Page of 3  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard